Cases 91 - 100 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv06952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Martinez v. Dyer et al
as 2:2026cv04167
Plaintiff:
Anthony Michael Martinez
Defendant:
Charles Dyer, Arizona, State of, Catherine Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster v. SSM Health Care St Louis et al
as 4:2026cv00941
Plaintiff:
Tina Webster
Defendant:
SSM Health Care St Louis, Pharmacia & Upjohn Company LLC and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Stanton v. WALMART INC
as 3:2026cv00444
Plaintiff:
Tina Marie Stanton
Defendant:
WALMART INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Martin v. City of Portland, et al.
as 26-3777
Plaintiff:
DAVID P. MARTIN and We the people, et al
Defendant:
CITY OF PORTLAND, COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH, TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION and others
Sasinka v. Bisignano
as 1:2026cv06916
Plaintiff:
Tina Marie Sasinka
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Coats v. Williamson et al
as 3:2026cv05624
Defendant:
Madeline Williamson, Maddie, Nick Hoke and others
Plaintiff:
Marshall Allen Coats
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Persico v. FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC. et al
as 2:2026cv03971
Plaintiff:
Tina Renee Persico
Defendant:
FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC., ABC CO.(s) 1-10 and JOHN DOE(S) 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
