Cases 91 - 100 of 102
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 0.06 of Acres of Land, More or Less et al
as 1:2008cv00370
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
0.06 of Acres of Land, More or Less, Victor Perez, Patricia C Perez and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Villafranca v. Westchester Express, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv23186
Plaintiff:
Luis Villafranca
Defendant:
Westchester Express, Inc., Victor Perez and Maria Lorido
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Perez v. United States of America
as 4:2007cv00727
Petitioner:
Victor Perez, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2007cv03135
Plaintiff:
Cindy Johnson
Defendant:
City of Cleveland and Victor Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Castro
as 07-40762
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
VICTOR PEREZ CASTRO, also known as Manuel Guzman
Perez v. Wall
as 1:2007cv00228
Petitioner:
Victor Perez
Respondent:
A. T. Wall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz v. Alverez et al
as 3:2007cv00175
Plaintiff:
Humberto Diaz
Defendant:
Javier Alverez, Carmen I. Perez, Edward Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Gonzalez et al v. Palo Duro Meat Processing, Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00033
Plaintiff:
Enrique Gonzalez, Enrique Gonzalez, Sirilo S Gudino and others
Defendant:
Palo Duro Meat Processing, Inc., Palo Duro Meat Processing, Inc., Terry D Caviness and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
