Cases 91 - 100 of 12,810
Doe et al v. Rees
as 3:2024cv00274
Defendant:
Jonathan Rees, Greg Ellis, Johnathan Rees and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, John Doe, II, John Doe, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
ARACHNE, LLC et al v. SLICKLEN et al
as 2:2024cv05343
Plaintiff:
ARACHNE, LLC and SOPHIA WOJCZAK
Defendant:
ELLEN SLICKLEN and CONAIR LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Stile Societa Cooperativa v. Brickman et al
as 1:2024cv11040
Plaintiff:
Stile Societa Cooperativa
Defendant:
Howard Brickman and Brickman Consulting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Grenell v. Troye
as 1:2024cv00646
Plaintiff:
Richard Grenell
Defendant:
Olivia Troye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Harris v. United States
as 5:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Bobby Leon Harris, Jr.
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with Civil Rights
Jonathan Gould v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, et al
as 24-1704
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN GOULD
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA and JP MORGAN CHASE & CO
RE Carroll Management Company v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
as 24-1342
Plaintiff:
RE CARROLL MANAGEMENT COMPANY, CIP CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, CARROLL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT US, LLC and others
Defendant:
DUN & BRADSTREET, INCORPORATED, DUN & BRADSTREET HOLDINGS, INC. and THE DUN & BRADSTREET CORPORATION
McBride et al v. Sacks et al
as 3:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Ty McBride and Mason Lane Entertainment LLC
Defendant:
Hank Sacks, Partisan Arts, Inc. and Selmona LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Matthew Jones v. Judicial Branch of United States Government
as 24-5090
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Judicial Branch of United States Government
Ruby Freeman, et al v. Rudolph Giuliani
as 24-7021
Plaintiff:
Ruby Freeman and Wandrea' Moss
Defendant:
Rudolph W. Giuliani
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
