Cases 101 - 110 of 228
Jones v. Allstate Indemnity Company et al
as 1:2018cv00164
Defendant:
Allstate Indemnity Company and Jeffrey M. Daniels
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Balcarcel
as 2:2018cv12003
Respondent:
Mark McCullick and Erick Balcarcel
Petitioner:
Cordell Daniel Jones
Jones v. First National Collection Bureau, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00519
Defendant:
First National Collection Bureau, Inc. and Pinnacle Credit Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00938
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jones v. FedEx Grounds
as 4:2018mc00876
Plaintiff:
Danielle Jones
Defendant:
FedEx Grounds
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Jones v. Lubrizol Corporation
as 1:2018cv00011
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Defendant:
Lubrizol Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jones et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
as 1:2017cv12489
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones and Mary Jones
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1349
Jones v. Cuomo
as 17-3551
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Andrew M. Cuomo, New York State Govenor, Sandy Hamlin, Adminstrative Assistant, Donna Hall, Acting Associate Commissioner, Office of Mental Health and others
Defendant:
Eric T. Schneiderman, New York State Attorney General, Multi-Disciplinary Staff, Office of Mental Health, Records Coordinator, Fishkill Correctional Facility, Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and others
Jones v. United States of America et al
as 1:2017cv00138
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jones
Defendant:
United States of America and Gerald Stringer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Wells v. Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv06245
Plaintiff:
Marvin D. Wells
Defendant:
Eddie Johnson, DM Rodriguez, A. Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
