Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 895
In re: Washington Mutual Inc, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1725
Debtor: In re: WMI INVESTMENT CORP and WASHINGTON MUTUAL INC
Defendant / Appellee: MORGAN STANLEY & CO INC, CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES USA, WMI LIQUIDATING TRUST and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALICE GRIFFIN
Alaska Electrical Pension Fund v. Bank of America Corporation
as 20-1086
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Nomura Holdings Inc., Royal Bank of Scotland plc and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: County of Washington, Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission, Portigon AG and others
Plaintiff: County of Beaver, Pennsylvania, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, Magnolia Regional Health Center, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, UNIQA Capital Markets GmbH, on behalf of UNIQA Dollar Bond and others
Appellant: Fortinbras Asset Management GmbH
Acerno v. Benchimol et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01502
Defendant: Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Julio Capua Ramos da Silva and others
Plaintiff: Joseph Acerno
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Mobile Networking Solutions, LLC v. Goldman Sachs & Co., LLC
as 1:2020cv01061
Defendant: Goldman Sachs & Co., LLC
Plaintiff: Mobile Networking Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Ford v. ProShares Trust II
as 20-419
Defendant: Jefferies LLC, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Barclays Capital Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Michael L. Sapir, Newedge USA LLC, Todd B. Johnson and others
Petitioner / Appellant: Lisa Ludovici, Thomas Butler, III and Anthony Ludovici
Plaintiff: David A. Ford, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Christakis Vrakas, et al v. United States Steel Corp, et al
as 20-8003
Not Yet Classified: MARIO LONGHI, CHRISTAKIS VRAKAS, DAVID B. BURRITT and others
In Re 2U, Inc. Securities Class Action We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2019cv03455
Petitioner: Employees' Retirement System of the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority, DeKalb County Pension Fund, Herbert Saunders and others
Respondent: Catherine A. Graham, 2U, Inc. and Christopher J. Paucek
Plaintiff: Oklahoma City Employee Retirement System
Defendant: Harsha Mokkarala, Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, Compass Point Research & Trading, LLC and others
Interested Party: Emerson College
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 j
James Erickson, et al v. Snap Inc., et al
as 19-80157
Defendant: WILLIAM BLAIR & COMPANY, LLC, CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC., LUMA SECURITIES, LLC and others
Petitioner: DAVID SPRING, D.D.S., TOM DIBIASE, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, on behalf of New Mexico State Investment Council and others
Plaintiff: SHINU GUPTA, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and DAVID STEINBERG
Not Yet Classified: SMILKA MELGOZA, as trustee of the Smilka Melgoza Trust U/A DTD, JAMES ERICKSON, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, DONALD R. ALLEN and others
Intervenor: WEI C. HSIEH and CHENGHSIN D. HSIEH
City Of Miami General Employees' & Sanitation Employees' Retirement Trust v. Venator Materials PLC et al
as 4:2019cv04266
Defendant: Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Douglas D. Anderson, Huntsman (Holdings) Netherlands B.V. and others
Plaintiff: City of Miami General Employees & Sanitation Employees Retirement Trust
Petitioner: Fresno County Employees Retirement Association and City of Pontiac General Employees Retirement System
City of Baton Rouge/East Baton Rouge Parish et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00725
Defendant: Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Merrill Lynch, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff: City of Baton Rouge/East Baton Rouge Parish, Consolidated Parish Employees Retirement System and Police Guaranty Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?