Cases 101 - 110 of 168
James Washington, Jr. v. Kaz, et al
as 11-10232
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
KAZ, JONES, Head of classification and HODGE
Liggett et al v. Valued Member Credit Union et al
as 3:2011cv00081
Plaintiff:
Matt Liggett and Sheila Raines
Defendant:
Valued Member Credit Union , Dana Richardson , Ike Rookmaker and others
Cross_claimant:
Ike Rookmaker
Cross_defendant:
Dana Richardson and Valued Member Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Turelli
as 11-441
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Andrew Turelli, AKA Andrew, James Montelone, AKA Monte, John Alfonso and others
Defendant - Appellant:
James Washington, AKA Harlem
James Washington, Jr. v. Plantl, et al
as 11-10041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
LT NFN PLANTL, Powledge Unit, LT NFN STANHOLT, Powledge Unit, SIMS, Lt, Powledge Unit and others
James Washington, Jr. v. Sims, et al
as 10-11305
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES WASHINGTON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SIMS and PLENTYL
Washington v. USA
as 3:2010cv70317
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lionel James Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Branum et al v. Valued Member Credit Union et al
as 3:2010cv00852
Plaintiff:
Jovita Branum , Stephanie Mills , Lindsey Poole and others
Defendant:
Valued Member Credit Union, Dana Richardson, Ike Rookmaker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Washington et al
as 2:2010cv03380
Plaintiff:
Anthony Earl Smith
Defendant:
James Washington, Moorer and Tony Dosby
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Kaz et al
as 3:2010cv02404
Plaintiff:
James Washington, Jr
Defendant:
NFN Kaz, NFN Jones and NFN Hodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Medical Director
as 6:2010cv00612
Plaintiff:
James Washington, Jr
Defendant:
Medical Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
