Cases 101 - 110 of 2,819
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hancock v. Schwartz Vays et al
as 1:2022cv02016
Plaintiff:
ROXANNE HANCOCK
Defendant:
Schwartz Vays, Schwartz Vays NY, LLC and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
FALCONE v. DICKSTEIN et al
as 3:2022cv00921
Plaintiff:
GEORGE FALCONE
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT NEIL DICKSTEIN, MICHELLE LAMBERT, MICHAEL S. AMOROSO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
GRANT v. SLATTERY et al
as 3:2022cv00941
Plaintiff:
MOSHE GRANT
Defendant:
THOMAS J. SLATTERY, ERIC HIBBS, RANDY HELLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MURRAY-NOLAN v. RUBIN, et al
as 2:2022cv00801
Defendant:
GWYNETH K. MURRAY-NOLAN, SCOTT RUBIN, KURT PETSCHOW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
C North PTL et al v. Bennett
as 4:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
C North PTL, John Doe 1-25 and State of South Carolina, The
Defendant:
Alston Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Khoo v. T-Mobile USA Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Philip Khoo
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0101 Federal Communications Act of 1934
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Billings Yellow Cab, LLC v. National Indemnity Company et al
as 1:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Billings Yellow Cab, LLC
Defendant:
National Indemnity Company, Zurich Agency Services, Inc., Northern States Agency Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
