Cases 101 - 110 of 162
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company Americas v. Bradford et al
as 3:2012cv01077
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company Americas
Defendant:
Sylverster Bradford and John Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Deuteshe Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee v. Robinson et al
as 3:2012cv00744
Plaintiff:
Deuteshe Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee
Defendant:
John Robinson and Sylverster Bradford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Deuteshe Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee v. Robinson et al
as 4:2012cv00744
Plaintiff:
Deuteshe Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee
Defendant:
John Robinson and Sylverster Bradford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Maric v. Fresno County et al
as 1:2012cv00102
Plaintiff:
Dennis Maric
Defendant:
Fresno County, Margret Mims, - Alvarado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daker v. Robinson et al
as 1:2012cv00118
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
John Robinson, J. Simpson, Gary D. George and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slocum v. Wayne, County of et al
as 2:2011cv14867
Plaintiff:
Daniel Slocum
Defendant:
Wayne, County of , Wayne County Sheriff Department , Benny N. Napoleon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBINSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
as 2:2011cv55672
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBINSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ROBINSON v. HOLMES et al
as 2:2011cv06074
Petitioner:
JOHN ROBINSON
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER HOLMES and PAULA T. DOW, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-4056
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robinson, Jr. v. Social Security Administration et al
as 2:2011cv01567
Plaintiff:
John Robinson, Jr
Defendant:
United States Social Security Administration and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
