Cases 101 - 110 of 164
Solorzano-Vargas et al v. AJK Enterprises et al
as 3:2014cv00027
Defendant:
AJK Enterprises, Gary Don Jackson, James Leslie Jackson and others
915) 544-3789 (fax:
Martin Cano-Ortega, Everardo Carmona, Jose Contreras and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801 Farmworker Rights
FERNANDEZ-SANTIAGO v. COBALT TRANSPORATION, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv07495
Plaintiff:
JOSE FERNANDEZ-SANTIAGO
Defendant:
COBALT TRANSPORATION, INC. , KES TRUCKING and MICHAEL KES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Alberto Castanon
as 13-4701
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALBERTO CASTANON, a/k/a Alberto Ardon Miranda a/k/a Tito a/k/a Jose R. Santiago
ACM Penfield CFL, LLC v. Inmobiliaria Robles, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01770
Plaintiff:
ACM Penfield CFL, LLC
Defendant:
Inmobiliaria Robles, Inc., Francheska Lopez-Quinonez, Jose Carlos Santiago-Vazquez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larenos en Defensa del Patrimo, et al v. Municipality of Lares, et al
as 13-2042
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LARENOS EN DEFENSA DEL PATRIMONIO HISTORICO, INC., YAMIL GUZMAN-GONZALEZ, ALMA IRIZARRY-TOLDEO and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MUNICIPALITY OF LARES and ROBERTO PAGAN-CENTENO, in his official capacity and as Mayor of Lares, and in his personal capacity
Santiago-Montanez v. United States of America et al
as 3:2013cv01266
Plaintiff:
Jose E. Santiago-Montanez
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Veterans Affairs, J. Garcia-Saavedra and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Santiago v. United States of America
as 13-902
Petitioner - Appellant:
Jose Enrique Santiago
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
SANTIAGO v. LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON et al
as 5:2013cv00488
Plaintiff:
JOSE M. SANTIAGO
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON, DENNIS J. MOLYNEAUX, NIKI DIXION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
