Cases 101 - 110 of 111
Timothy Whiting v. Stan Henry, et al
as 11-56246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY LEWIS WHITING
Defendant - Appellee:
STAN HENRY, former Chief of Police, in his individual capacity as a peace officer with the Cathedral City Police Department, STANLEY SNIFF, individually as Sheriff of Riverside County, DAVID G. DOMINGUEZ, former Chief of Police, in his individual capacity as a peace officer with the Palm Springs Police Department and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv01161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Timothy Lewis Whiting v. Stan Henry et al
as 5:2011cv00552
Defendant:
Adams, Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Agua Caliente Casino Resort Spa and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lewis Whiting
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Robert Middleton v. Paragon Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv07645
Plaintiff:
Robert Middleton and Robert Middleton
Defendant:
Paragon Systems, Inc., Paragon Systems, Inc. and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv05166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bailey v. Robinson, Jr. et al
as 2:2008cv01020
Plaintiff:
Leon Bailey
Defendant:
John Robinson, Jr., Securitas Security Services USA Inc, Paragon Systems Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 rt Job Discrimination/Retaliation
King v. Paragon Systems, Inc et al
as 3:2007mc00010
Plaintiff:
Daniel King
Defendant:
Paragon Systems, Inc and Employers Insurance Company of Wausau
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
