Cases 111 - 120 of 132,059
Ong v. Scruggs
as 1:2024cv01662
Petitioner:
Lye H. Ong
Respondent:
Carolyn J. Scruggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ordonez Vega v. Paramore et al
as 3:2024cv00538
Plaintiff:
Luis Ordonez Vega
Defendant:
Walter H. Paramore, III, Jeremy Barrett Smith, Michael Bornstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Miller v. Dunn
as 24-10500
Plaintiff:
Bradley B. Miller
Defendant:
Virginia Talley Dunn, Individually, Andrea Plumlee, In both Individual and Official Capacities, Danielle Diaz, In both Individual and Official Capacities and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
McWashington v. Rodgers et al
as 4:2024cv02153
Plaintiff:
Brandon McWashington
Defendant:
Brian G. Curtis, Noe Garza, Melissa A. Hinojosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rowe v. H & R Block
as 3:2024cv03403
Plaintiff:
Richard David Rowe, Jr.
Defendant:
H & R Block
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
P&H Casters Company, Inc. v. P&H Industries, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv01187
Plaintiff:
P&H Casters Company, Inc.
Defendant:
P&H Industries, LLC and Gary Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Tucker v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2024cv01005
Plaintiff:
Brezell Tucker
Defendant:
G. Gonzalez, H. Trillo, F. Camacho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
