Cases 111 - 120 of 2,014
Hamman v. Boyer et al
as 1:2023cv01791
Plaintiff:
James Stephen Hamman
Defendant:
Ardwin Boyer, David Statham, Newman, Boyer & Statham, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Thacker v. Abott et al
as 5:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
David Kent Thacker, Jr.
Defendant:
Greg Abott, Ken Paxton, Lisa McMinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bey v. Carver et al
as 4:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
Kevin Moore Bey
Defendant:
Lt. Charles Carver, Sgt. Alex Downy, Cheryl Boyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyer v. UNFI Wholesale Inc.
as 1:2023cv00429
Plaintiff:
Timothy Boyer
Defendant:
UNFI Wholesale Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Thacker v. Abott et al
as 4:2023cv00966
Plaintiff:
David Kent Thacker, Jr.
Defendant:
Gregg Abott, Ken Paxton, Lisa McMinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bushansky v. Atlas Technical Consultants, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01987
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Atlas Technical Consultants, Inc., L. Joe Boyer, R. Foster Duncan and others
Shade v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
John William Shade, III
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, United States Department of Justice, Jason Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blair v. Hughes et al
as 4:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Diamond-Donnell D. Blair
Defendant:
Allen Hughes, Michael Miller, Jason Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheridan v. Atlas Technical Consultants, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01911
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sheridan
Defendant:
Atlas Technical Consultants, Inc., L. Joe Boyer, R. Foster Duncan and others
Moore v. Valley III et al
as 1:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Jimmy C Moore
Defendant:
Randy Valley III, Rona Siegert, Corizon Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
