Cases 111 - 120 of 7,837
Terrell v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 24-1079
Petitioner:
BROOKS TERRELL
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Key v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 24-1140
Plaintiff:
DAJUAN KEY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, named as in their Individual and Official Capacity(ies)
Cosby v. Ciolli, et al
as 24-1072
Plaintiff:
GREGORY D. COSBY
Defendant:
A CIOLLI, Warden ADX, BILL TRUE, Former Warden, AWS PROGRAMS COMPLEX and others
Davis v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv01538
Petitioner:
Jamar Davis
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Florence High
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bolden v. F B O P
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Jer'Marise Bolden
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and F B O P
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Martin Jonassen, et al v. BOP, et al
as 24-1327
Plaintiff:
MARTIN JONASSEN and ELIZABETH MARY JONASSEN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MR. PERKINS
Ward v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 0:2024cv00571
Petitioner:
Madison Ward
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Anaya v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv01080
Plaintiff:
Martin Anaya
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, K. Bennett, . Smythe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pinsory et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv01312
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinsory, Elmer Moreno, Ernesto Zaragosa-Solis, III and others
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2024cv00186
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, U.S. MARSHALS SERVICE and U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
