Cases 111 - 120 of 359
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv12946
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ng v. Browne et al
as 1:2018cv04446
Plaintiff:
Nicholas NG
Defendant:
Glenn H Browne and Amtrak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Wright v. Stewart et al
as 1:2018cv07174
Defendant:
James Hooke, Martin Stanley, Liam Stewart and others
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Wright
Nominal Defendant:
Macquarie Infrastructure Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fd
Brown v. Clayman, M.D. et al
as 3:2018cv00512
Plaintiff:
Crystle H. Brown
Defendant:
Loren Z. Clayman, M.D., Loren Z. Clayman, M.D., P.A., Allergan, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
BROWN v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv06857
Plaintiff:
BYRON H. BROWN
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kaigler v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2018cv00350
Defendant:
Butch H. Browning, Shirley Coody, Jimmy Guidry and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Kaigler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv00814
Plaintiff:
THOMAS H. BROWN, JR.
214) 744-7590 (fax:
Ben C. Martin
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROWN v. MAY et al
as 2:2018cv00450
Plaintiff:
ERIC H. BROWN
Defendant:
G. MAY, LEBESCO, D. CHOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De La Haye v. Hitt et al
as 6:2018cv00135
Plaintiff:
Donald De La Haye
Defendant:
John C. Hitt , Daniel J. White , A. Dale Whittaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Clayman, M.D. et al
as 3:2018cv00062
Plaintiff:
Crystle H. Brown
Defendant:
Loren Z. Clayman, M.D. , Loren Z. Clayman, M.D., P.A. , Allergan, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
