Cases 111 - 120 of 166
USA v. Jonathan William
as 17-5325
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JONATHAN WILLIAMS
Williams v. Strange (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00945
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Williams
Defendant:
Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan Thuener v. Warden
as 16-3957
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN WILLIAM THUENER
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, Correctional Reception Center
Jason Jonathan William Erstad v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 2:2016cv01629
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Jason Jonathan William Erstad
Graham v. USA
as 6:2016cv00140
Petitioner:
Jonathan William Graham
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Trustees of the Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local 13 Defined Contribution Pension Trust For Southern Nevada et al v. Commercial Union Tile & Stone, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv02129
Plaintiff:
Bricklayers & Allied Craftworks Local 13 Nevada, Trustees of the Bricklayers & Allied Crafttsworkers Local 13 Health Benefits Fund, Trustees of the Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local 13 Defined Contribution Pension Trust For Southern Nevada and others
Defendant:
Jonathan William Canja, Commercial Union Tile & Stone, Inc., Jedediah Michael Feller and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Thuener v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Insititution
as 2:2015cv02867
Petitioner:
Jonathan William Thuener
Respondent:
Warden, Lebanon Correctional Insititution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Strange (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00065
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Williams
Defendant:
Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
