Cases 111 - 120 of 144
Carr v. Harris et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2011cv00149
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Carr
Defendant:
Officer Harris and Officer More
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doss et al v. Young et al
as 5:2011cv00116
Defendant:
Officer Delane Barnes, Sgt. James Bowlin, Sgt. Jonathan Cline and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Doss and Louis V. Doss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Harris et al
as 1:2011cv01041
Plaintiff:
Abdoul Amir Shakoor Robinson
Defendant:
Officer Harris and Several John Doe Police Officers of Queens Central Booking
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. The Chairman of the Texas Board of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2010cv00646
Plaintiff:
Dreaglen S Davis
Defendant:
The Chairman of the Texas Board of Criminal Justice, Susan Bauer, D Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. The Chairman of the Texas Board of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2010cv03976
Plaintiff:
Dreaglen S Davis
Defendant:
The Chairman of the Texas Board of Criminal Justice, Susan Bauer, D Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Welch v. McNeil et al
as 3:2010cv00959
Plaintiff:
Eric A. Welch
Defendant:
Walter A. McNeil, Mr. Riska, Danica M. Pollock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingles et al v. Potter et al
as 3:2010cv00965
Plaintiff:
Adam Ingles, Christorpher Jennette, James Small and others
Defendant:
Lieu Potter, Lieu Sterling, Sgt. Ramons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Bostic et al
as 3:2010cv00906
Plaintiff:
Robert Mason
Defendant:
Officer Bostic, Sergeant Watts, Lt. Sallie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sumrall v. Harris et al
as 1:2010cv00128
Plaintiff:
Ammon Ra Sumrall
Defendant:
Officer Harris, Officer Hart, Officer Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newby v. Harris et al
as 1:2010cv05166
Plaintiff:
Travis Deshun Newby
Defendant:
Officer Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
