Cases 111 - 120 of 375
Wilnick Dorval v. Sapphire Village Condominium A, et al
as 20-1681
Defendant:
BERNARD M. VANSLUYTMAN, MICHELE LANGE, RICHARD W. O'DELL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SIDNEY JARVIS, JONATHON MORGAN, MADLON JENKINS-RUDZIAK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILNICK DORVAL
Whyte v. Tompkins County Sheriff et al
as 9:2020cv00284
Defendant:
Andrew McElwee, Boda, Daniel Bomysoad and others
Plaintiff:
Corbin Whyte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hollins, Emon v. Goodman, J. et al
as 3:2020cv00188
Defendant:
J. Goodman, C.O. Whyte, Sgt. Perry and others
Not Classified By Court:
WCI Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Emon V. Hollins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01800
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WHYTE v. BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2020cv00806
Petitioner:
GREGORY WHYTE
Respondent:
BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States of America v. Whyte
as 20-313
Defendant:
Niren Davis, AKA King, Sasha Swain, Kemar Cameron and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Whyte, AKA Jak Mac
Whyte v. Suffolk County
as 2:2020cv00240
Defendant:
Suffolk County
Plaintiff:
Jovanni G. Whyte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Whyte v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv13935
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christy Whyte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kuang-Bao Ou-Young v. Edward LEAVY, et al
as 19-17031
Defendant / Appellee:
RUTH BADER GINSBURG, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, and as an individual, SAMUEL CONTI, Former District Judge, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, and his estate, MARY M. SCHROEDER, and as an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KUANG-BAO P. OU-YOUNG
WHYTE v. STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC.
as 2:2019cv01092
Plaintiff:
TREVOR L. WHYTE
Defendant:
STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
