Cases 121 - 130 of 294
Rodriguez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2017cv00950
Plaintiff:
David Rodriguez
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Keith Buchanan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Rodriguez-De-Jesu
as 17-1281
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID RODRIGUEZ-DE-JESUS
Lopez, et al v. State of New Mexico, et al
as 17-2036
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PHILLIP O. LOPEZ and FELIX GONZALES
Defendant - Appellant:
OFFICER DAVID RODRIGUEZ and DETECTIVE MICHAEL RICKARDS, in their official and individual capacities as employees of the City of Las Cruces
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW MEXICO and THE CITY OF LAS CRUCES
Rodriguez v. Xtreme Auto Carrier, Inc. et al
as 6:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
David Rodriguez
Defendant:
Xtreme Auto Carrier, Inc. and Lizneth D. Ravelo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rodriguez v. Windham Educational Department
as 6:2016cv01398
Plaintiff:
David Rodriguez
Defendant:
Windham Educational Department and Unknown Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Rodriguez v. J. Lizarraga
as 16-17218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID RODRIGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
J. LIZARRAGA
Saul v. Franciscan Tertiary Province of the Sacred Heart, Inc., et al
as 1:2016cv10974
Plaintiff:
Robert Saul
Defendant:
Franciscan Tertiary Province of the Sacred Heart, Inc and David Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
David Rodriguez v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2016cv02321
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Sheriff Stan Sniff and William Di Yori
Plaintiff:
David Rodriguez
Rodriguez et al v. David's Burrito Express LLC et al
as 1:2016cv10349
Plaintiff:
Adrian Rodriguez and Alfredo Gonzalez Trejo
Defendant:
David's Burrito Express LLC and David Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
RODRIGUEZ v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 1:2016cv08197
Plaintiff:
DAVID RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., COUNTRYWIDE BANK, FSB, COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
