Cases 121 - 130 of 173
David Colllins v. Secretary, Florida Department
as 11-15368
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID LYNN COLLLINS
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Edwin G. Buss
Merrill Lynch International Finance, Inc. et al v. Lynn
as 3:2011mc01278
Plaintiff:
Merrill Lynch International Finance, Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Defendant:
David Lynn
Merrill Lynch International Finance, Inc. et al v. Lynn
as 3:2011cv02351
Plaintiff:
Merrill Lynch International Finance, Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Defendant:
David Lynn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Luttrell v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2011cv00471
Petitioner:
David Lynn Luttrell
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PECHE v. KELLER et al
as 1:2011cv00362
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYNN PECHE
Defendant:
ALVIN W. KELLER, JR. and TODD W. PINION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER et al v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63669
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYNN TURNER and JOYCE GREENWOOD TURNER
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION, OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PECHE v. KELLER et al
as 1:2011cv00249
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYNN PECHE
Defendant:
ALVIN W. KELLER, JR., TODD W. PINION and SHEILA H. FLOWERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moss v. Thaler
as 3:2011cv00411
Petitioner:
David Lynn Moss
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WOOD et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61150
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYNN WOOD and REBA L. WOOD
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, INC. , GAF CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burnette et al v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00533
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Burnette and Tina Burnette
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
