Cases 121 - 130 of 3,755
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv08697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nick Castaneda et al v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2023cv02246
Plaintiff:
Nick Castaneda and Claudia Sandoval
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino, Children and Family Services, Shannae Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raul v. Crane et al
as 1:2023cv14748
Plaintiff:
Pinchas E. Raul
Defendant:
Christopher M. Crane, Joseph Dominguez, Anne R. Pramaggiore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Roach v. Dominguez et al
as 5:2023cv05194
Plaintiff:
George Lee Roach
Defendant:
Officer Zeus Dominguez and Nurse S. Golden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dominguez v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv02316
Plaintiff:
Erika Dominguez
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County Estrella Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dominguez v. Lunsford et al
as 2:2023cv00981
Plaintiff:
Vidal Dominguez
Defendant:
Brad Lunsford and The Cityof Las Cruces
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez Dominguez v. Garland
as 23-3888
Petitioner:
RAMON GONZALEZ DOMINGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Zepeda-Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3906
Petitioner:
LUIS FELIPE ZEPEDA-MARTINEZ, ARLENA SARAHI DOMINGUEZ-FUNEZ and ENOC ZEPEDA-DOMINGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
