Cases 121 - 130 of 137
Nathan Smith v. The State of Texas et al
as 2:2011cv06884
Defendant:
Bruce Bennett, Brien O Connor gst non exempt trust, Terry Carroll and others
Personal And Individual Capacity:
Morgan Dunn O Connor
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Daniels v. Richardson et al
as 2:2011cv01477
Plaintiff:
Daisy Daniels
Defendant:
Andrea Richardson, John Modrick, Nathan Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan O'Connor v. Nathan Smith
as 10-41184
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MORGAN DUNN O'CONNOR, as Trustee of the Brien O'Connor Dunn GST Non-Exempt Trust
Defendant - Appellant:
NATHAN SMITH, also known as Nathan Smith
Smith v. Rios Jr., et al
as 1:2010cv01554
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
H. A. Rios, Jr. and Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Rios Jr., et al
as 2:2010cv02108
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
H. A. Rios, Jr. and Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Richardson et al
as 2:2010cv01239
Plaintiff:
Daisy Daniels
Defendant:
Andra Richardson, Joseph M Arpaio, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathan Smith v. Gary Hutchins, et al
as 10-11440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHAN SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY HUTCHINS, Sheriff and EDWARD J. TARVER, United States Attorney
Smith, et al v. Kenny, et al
as 09-2301
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LINDA SMITH, MATTHEW SMITH and NATHAN SMITH
Defendant - Appellant:
SEAN KENNY, CASSANDRA KUKOWSKI, CASEY MCDONNELL and others
Defendant:
JOHN FRIEDFERTIG
Smith v. Hutchins et al
as 1:2009cv00147
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
Gary Hutchins and Edward J. Tarver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clearview Centers, LLC v. Nathan Smith et al
as 2:2009cv05808
Plaintiff:
Clearview Centers, LLC, Clearview Centers, LLC and Clearview Centers, LLC
Defendant:
Nathan Smith, Clearview Drug and Alcohol Rehabilitation Center and Does
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
