Cases 121 - 130 of 939
Abel Barajas v. Paccar, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv02002
Plaintiff:
Abel Barajas
Defendant:
Cummins, Inc., Does, Inland Kenworth US Inc. and others
Ranjit Singh v. Paccar Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07035
Defendant:
Cummins Inc., Does, Inland Kenworth US Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ranjit Singh
Abel Barajas v. Paccar, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07038
Plaintiff:
Abel Barajas
Defendant:
Cummins, Inc., Does, Inland Kenworth US Inc. and others
Ranjit Singh v. Paccar Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv02011
Defendant:
Cummins Inc., Does, Inland Kenworth US Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ranjit Singh
Fink et al v. Spirit Services of WV, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv08669
Plaintiff:
Erik Fink and Wendy Fink
Defendant:
Spirit Services of WV, LLC, Worldwide Equipment, Inc., Worldwide Equipment Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pfingsten v. Southern Wisconsin Auto and Tire, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00316
Plaintiff:
Leon Pfingsten
Defendant:
Southern Wisconsin Auto and Tire, LLC and Paccar, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bernal et al v. Paccar, Inc et al
as 5:2016cv00808
Plaintiff:
Alyssa Bernal, Nancy Bernal and Octavio Bernal, Jr.
Defendant:
French Ellison Truck Center, LLC, Kenworth Truck Company and Paccar, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Cox, Sr. v. AGCO Corporation, et al.
as 4:2016cv00084
Defendant:
AGCO Corporation, Star Machine & Tool, SPX Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Cox, Sr, Jack Howard Cox, Sr., Valerie M. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Galloway v. PACCAR, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00104
Plaintiff:
Denania Galloway
Defendant:
PACCAR, Inc. and Power Transport, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Galloway v. PACCAR, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00705
Plaintiff:
Denania Galloway
Defendant:
PACCAR, Inc. and Power Transport, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
