Cases 121 - 130 of 228
Knowles v. Stephens
as 5:2014cv00481
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Kenneth Ronald Knowles
Respondent:
William (Bill) Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Livingston v. Escrow
as 14-1589
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Detroy Livingston
Defendant:
John Doe
Defendant - Appellee:
James Escrow, G. Harvey, Keith Harvey and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-11665
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Morton v. Copenhaver et al
as 1:2014cv00095
Plaintiff:
Les Morton
Defendant:
Deke Copenhaver, William Fennoy, Corey Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hickman v. Cornwell et al
as 1:2014cv00368
Plaintiff:
Steven O. Hickman
Defendant:
John G. Cornwell, SANE Nurse, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edgar Patton v. Phillip Bryant, et al
as 14-60148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDGAR PATTON
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILLIP "PHIL" BRYANT, RANDAL THOMAS, MICHAEL "MIKE" HOWIE and others
Goodwin et al v. County of Summit, Ohio et al
as 5:2014cv00121
Plaintiff:
Keith Goodwin and Keith Heating and Cooling, Inc.
Defendant:
County of Summit, Ohio , Russell M. Pry , John M. Labriola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston v. Sheahan et al
as 6:2013cv06594
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Houston
Defendant:
Michael Sheahan, M. Thoms, Coveny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grisham, James et al v. Integrity First Bank et al
as 3:2013cv00587
Plaintiff:
James R. Grisham and Susan C. Grisham
Defendant:
Integrity First Bank, David ("Dave") Klein, Melissa Langbehn Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Patton v. Bryant et al
as 3:2013cv00485
Plaintiff:
Edgar Patton
Defendant:
Phillip "Phil" Bryant, Randal Thomas, Michael "Mike" Howie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
