Cases 121 - 130 of 332,677
Aponte v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 9:2024cv80275
Plaintiff:
Hector R Aponte
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Toolooze v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv04046
Plaintiff:
Aaron Toolooze
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sayre v. SSA
as 5:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Marion Russell Sayre
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
RIVERA v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
VICTOR RIVERA
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Clark v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Matthew L. Clark
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jasmine Boulden v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 24-1414
Plaintiff:
JASMINE BOULDEN
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Jamila Reeves v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1977
Plaintiff:
Jamila Reeves
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Efaw v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Steven P. Efaw
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McKinney v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Scott Joseph McKinney
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rabine v. Commissioner of SSA
as 6:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
David Paul Rabine
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
