Cases 121 - 130 of 4,558
Gay v. Payne
as 6:2023cv06011
Petitioner:
Randy William Gay
Respondent:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
In re: Anthony Apanovitch
as 23-3149
Petitioner:
In re: ANTHONY C. APANOVITCH
Respondent:
TIM SHOOP, Warden
Alfonso Blake v. William Gittere, et al
as 23-99001
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALFONSO MANUEL BLAKE
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM GITTERE and CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, Attorney General
Margaret A. Allen v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-10447
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARGARET A ALLEN
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Froman v. Shoop
as 2:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Froman
Defendant:
Warden Tim Shoop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Shinn et al
as 3:2023cv08023
Petitioner:
Frank Winfield Anderson
Respondent:
David Shinn and Staci Ibarra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Mullens v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Pinellas County)
as 8:2023cv00036
Defendant:
Mr. Khadafy Kareem Mullens
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE OF FLORIDA, Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Khadafy Kareem Mullens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wood v. Vandergriff
as 4:2023mc09002
Petitioner:
Craig Michael Wood
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopher Collings v. Cindy Griffith
as 23-1064
Petitioner / Appellant:
Christopher Collings
Respondent / Appellee:
Cindy Griffith
Theodore Shove v. State of California et al
as 2:2023cv01227
Petitioner:
Theodore Shove
Respondent:
State of California and U.S. District Court Central District of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
