Cases 131 - 140 of 142
Londo v. Ellis et al
as 2:2009cv07365
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Londo
Defendant:
Louis Ackal, Jack Cliffton, Johnny Sam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendez v. Brown
as 4:2009cv04163
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Mendez
Defendant:
Willy Mr. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Aqua America Inc., Aqua Virginia, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00687
Plaintiff:
Sallijo Freeman
Defendant:
Aqua America Inc., Aqua Virginia, Inc., Alpha Water Corporation, Aqua S/L, Inc., Aqua Utility-Virginia, Inc. (Lake Shawnee) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Dickerson et al v. Bals et al
as 2:2009cv01419
Plaintiff:
Bobby L. Dickerson, Jr.
Defendant:
Bals, Jessica Berline, H.L. Gut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsey v. Welsh et al
as 7:2009cv00095
Plaintiff:
Thomas Clifton Lindsey
Defendant:
Aronna Welsh, James Camon, Clarice Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santana v. Mr. Brown
as 1:2009cv05176
Petitioner:
Jose Santana
Respondent:
Mr. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Fischer et al
as 9:2008cv00271
Plaintiff:
Dudley Harris
Defendant:
Fischer, Supt. Corcoran, Maher and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harris v. Fischer et al
as 1:2008cv00090
Plaintiff:
Dudley Harris
Defendant:
Mr. Fischer, Mr. Corcoran, Mr. Maher and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Taylor v. Contour et al
as 1:2008cv00134
Plaintiff:
Paul Darnell Taylor
Defendant:
Dr. Contour, Dr. Labraris, Dr. Stein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aiken v. Corrigan, et al
as 3:2007cv01032
Plaintiff:
Warren Aiken, Jr.
Defendant:
Timothy Corrigan, Miss Rivers, Mr. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
