Cases 141 - 150 of 157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00103
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rwayne Johnson v. Dept of Veteran Affairs
as 2:2009cv00787
Plaintiff:
Rwayne Johnson
Defendant:
Dept of Veteran Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
GOVAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPT. OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
as 1:2008cv05630
Plaintiff:
RONALD E. GOVAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPT. OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Croxton v. US Dept of Veteran Affairs
as 8:2008cv01839
Plaintiff:
Mandell Croxton
Defendant:
US Dept of Veteran Affairs
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SLUPKOWSKI V JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL
as 08-1561
Respondent-Appellee:
General Counsel Dept of Health & Human Services, General Counsel Dept of Veterans Affairs and Judge Advocate General Dept of the U.S. Navy
Petitioner-Appellant:
Stanely A. Slupkowski
Matthews v. Dept. of Veterans Affairs et al
as 1:2008cv02455
Plaintiff:
Robert Richard Matthews
Defendant:
Dept. of Veterans Affairs and Veterans Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schroeder v. Dept of Veteran Affairs et al
as 3:2008cv00351
Plaintiff:
Paul Stuart Schroeder
Defendant:
Dept of Veteran Affairs, David Leonard, John Lankford and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Schroeder v. Dept of Veteran Affairs et al
as 3:2008mc00042
Plaintiff:
Paul Stuart Schroeder
Defendant:
Dept of Veteran Affairs, David Leonard, John Lankford and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Croxton v. US Dept of Veteran Affairs
as 3:2007cv00834
Plaintiff:
Mandell Croxton
Defendant:
US Dept of Veteran Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Veterans Affairs
as 07-1955
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL L. RICHARDSON, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
NATION DIRECTOR OF DEPT. OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, DIRECTOR VAMC - HAMPTON, DR. HUFFLER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
