Cases 141 - 150 of 261
US v. Anastacio Carreno-Espinoza
as 14-4107
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANASTACIO CARRENO-ESPINOZA
JOHNSON v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2014cv00419
Plaintiff:
GERMAINE JOHNSON
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, UNION COUNTY COURTHOUSE, COUNTY OF UNION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv02950
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Anastacio Escobar-Portillo v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-73389
Petitioner:
ANASTACIO ESCOBAR-PORTILLO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Michael Hayes v. CCA, et al
as 13-35887
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL T. HAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a Maryland corporation, JOHN FERGUSON, CEO, CCA, IDAHO CORRECTIONAL CENTER and others
USA v. Anastacio Soto
as 13-20456
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANASTACIO ARANDA SOTO, also known as Anastacio Aranda Garcia, also known as Anastacio Aranda-Soto
Edison et al v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv04679
Plaintiff:
Daniel Edison , Jorge Fernandez , Francisco Galvan and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc. , Transocean Deepwater Inc and Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 1349 Outer Continental Land Shelf Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01194
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Edison et al v. BP Exploration & Production Inc. et al
as TXS/4:13-cv-01431
Plaintiff:
Daniel Edison , Jorge Fernandez , Francisco Galvan and others
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production Inc. , Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. and Transocean Deepwater Services, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
