Cases 151 - 160 of 239
Capozzi v. Pigos et al
as 1:2011cv01628
Plaintiff:
Derek A. Capozzi
Defendant:
Pigos, Marc Holbrook, Michael J. Growse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
VISINTINE v. FEDERAL B.O.P. et al
as 1:2011cv04927
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. VISINTINE
Defendant:
FEDERAL B.O.P. and DHO A. BOYCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VISINTINE v. ZICKEFOOSE
as 1:2011cv04678
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. VISINTINE
Defendant:
DONNA ZICKEFOOSE , FEDERAL B.O.P. and A. BOYCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler v. Ray et al
as 4:2011cv00199
Petitioner:
Terry Tyler
Respondent:
C/O Ray, C/O Davis and B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NANTAMBU v. B.O.P. et al
as 1:2011cv01216
Plaintiff:
DAMANI MUATA NANTAMBU
Defendant:
B.O.P., HARLEY LAPPIN, ERIC HOLDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Wise v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 11-2414
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Timothy S. Wise
Defendant - Appellee:
Harley G. Lappin, Director, Bureau of Prisons, T. C. Outlaw, Warden, FCI - Forrest City, Daryl Maune, Captain, FCI - Forrest City and others
Defendant:
Angie Roach, Dentist, FCI - Forrest City
Ramirez v. B.O.P. Federal Prisons et al
as 1:2011cv00768
Plaintiff:
Vincent Y. Ramirez, Sr.
Defendant:
B.O.P. Federal Prisons , Turning Point Half Way House and Federal Probation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Soto v. United States of America et al
as 4:2011cv00055
Respondent:
B.I.C.E., US Attorney General, US B.O.P. and others
Petitioner:
Maikel Soto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reyes v. Federal B.O.P. et al
as 1:2011cv00076
Petitioner:
Felipe L Reyes
Respondent:
Federal B.O.P., Reality House Halfway House and Texas Dept of Motor Vehicle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv00035
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
