Cases 151 - 160 of 43,162
Michael McCain, Sr.In re: Michael McCain, Sr.
as 24-3904
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL D. MCCAIN, SR.
Respondent:
ROCHELLE MOORE
Person et al v. Boling et al
as 5:2024cv00150
Defendant:
Detective Mark Nichols, Christian County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Tyler Dearmond and others
Plaintiff:
Lashanda Person and Annastaja Hathaway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01430
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Moore v. Luster Products, Inc et al
as 1:2024cv10373
Defendant:
Luster Products, Inc, Namaste Laboratories LLC and Strength of Nature, LLC
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Moore v. Citizens, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02468
Defendant:
Citizens, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Joyce Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
THOMAS v. CONNELLY et al
as 1:2024cv00280
Defendant:
Court Administrator ROBERT J. CATALDE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY JACK DANERI, Defense Attorney WILLIAM J. HATHAWAY and others
Plaintiff:
JASON PHILLIP THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lindsey, Carlos v. Foster, Brian et al
as 3:2024cv00712
Defendant:
Kevin Carr, Larry Fuchs, Chong Xiong and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos D Lindsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Dustin Cade v. T. Moore, et al
as 24-5923
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN RAY CADE
Defendant:
OFFICER ANTONE, SERGEANT T. MOORE, WASHINGTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
USA v. Donnell Moore, Jr.
as 24-13326
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DONNELL LEMAN MOORE, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
