Cases 161 - 170 of 1,185,299
Khalaf v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 4:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Sattar Sabri Khalaf
Defendant:
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Spencer (ID 126729) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03071
Plaintiff:
Michaela Lea Spencer
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Donna Hook and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liles (ID 122198) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03070
Plaintiff:
Kora L. Liles
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Donna Hook and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Younger (ID 126377) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03069
Plaintiff:
Kimberley S. Younger
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Donna Hook and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bixler v. USA
as 5:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
Danny Ray Bixler
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lee v. USA
as 5:2024cv00135
Petitioner:
James Steven Lee
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
BATES v. HANCOX
as 1:2024cv00175
Petitioner:
FOSTER BATES
Respondent:
JAMES HANCOX
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - HABEAS CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goings v. Neekson et al
as 1:2024cv01396
Plaintiff:
Mark Cassidy Goings
Defendant:
Neekson, Figuroa and Gavigin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services
as 1:2024cv01397
Plaintiff:
Colonel Preston Long, III
Defendant:
Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Petersmark v. Burgess et al
as 4:2024cv11272
Plaintiff:
Joseph Robert Petersmark
Defendant:
Michael Burgess, J. Clouse, Jason Erway and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
