Cases 171 - 180 of 8,670
Barnes v. Crawford County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2024cv02077
Respondent:
Kevin Holmes, Crawford County Sheriff's Office and Jason Cooper
Petitioner:
Eureka R. Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. State of New York DOC and Comm Supervision
as 24-1584
Plaintiff:
CASANOVA HOLMES
Defendant:
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, JOHN DOE, Healthcare Official and ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00651
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Mary Holmes, et al v. Robert Knodell
as 24-2192
Plaintiff:
Mary Holmes, Empower Missouri, Denise Davis and others
Defendant:
Robert J. Knodell, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Missouri Department of Social Services
Holmes v. The People of State of New York
as 24-1582
Petitioner:
CASANOVA HOLMES
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER YEHL, Superintendent of Wende Correctional Facility
Defendant:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
Holmes et al v. Dennis et al
as 1:2024cv02546
Defendant:
Evan J. Pankey, Jonathan C. Dennis, Jordan Hopson and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Holmes and Lisette Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS v. BARNARD et al
as 5:2024cv00184
Defendant:
VICE CHAIRMAN DAVID HERRING, WAYNE BENNETT, CRYSTAL L MOON and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAY DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sauls v. Dallas Police Dept et al
as 3:2024cv01420
Defendant:
Dallas Police Dept and NFN Holmes
Plaintiff:
Precious S Sauls, I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Holmes et al v. FCA US LLC
as 2:2024cv01471
Plaintiff:
Shianka Holmes and Corey Holmes
Defendant:
FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
