Cases 11 - 20 of 9,249
DE LIMA v. WARDEN FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv06925
Petitioner:
PEDRO VICIOSO DE LIMA
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Restrepo v. Monte's Trattoria, Ltd., et al
as 1:2024cv04482
Plaintiff:
Jose Restrepo
Defendant:
Monte's Trattoria, Ltd.,, Peter Mosconi and Pedro Mosconi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Govea v. USA
as 6:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Pedro Govea
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Fuentes et al v. Aleksa Transportation LLC et al
as 3:2024cv08113
Plaintiff:
Pedro Torres Fuentes and Lorena Garcia Torres
Defendant:
Aleksa Transportation LLC, Joao Bosco Rizzari Assuncao and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Casilla-Diaz (PS) v. St. Thomas Moore Hospital et al
as 1:2024cv01618
Plaintiff:
Pedro Casilla-Diaz and Pedro Casila-Diaz
Defendant:
St. Thomas Moore Hospital, Keith Mihane and David Baumgartner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Innovative Sports Management Inc. v. Pedro Henrique Carvalho et al
as 2:2024cv04857
Plaintiff:
innovative sports and Innovative Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media
Defendant:
Pedro Henrique Carvalho, Edu Silva Moreira and Esquina Brasileira LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1934
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Kissimina et al v. Ed's Lobster Bar, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv04261
Plaintiff:
Nade Kissimina, Marilyn Roxana Pinargote Urbina, Pedro Franco and others
Defendant:
Ed's Lobster Bar, LLC and Edward McFarland
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
USA v. Samano-Mancilla
as 24-10489
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Pedro Samano-Mancilla
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
