Cases 11 - 20 of 1,938
BAYSTATE FRANKLIN MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv00822
Plaintiff:
BAYSTATE FRANKLIN MEDICAL CENTER, BAYSTATE NOBLE HOSPITAL, BAYSTATE WING HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
United States of America v. Faulkner
as 3:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gabrielle Faulkner
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Faulkner v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv02855
Plaintiff:
Randall Faulkner
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Gorbey v. Brian Davis, et al
as 24-11527
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant:
BRIAN J. DAVIS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISIONS, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Staton et al v. Cathey et al
as 3:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
J'on Staton and Cree Faulkner
Defendant:
Eddie Cathey, Christopher Hicks, Nicholas Kirkley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Faulkner
as 24-1110
Plaintiff:
SPENCER WILSON
Defendant:
STEVEN FELLOWS, KYLE FAULKNER, Individually and in his official capacity as a Town of Ulster Police Officer, TOWN OF ULSTER and others
Brian Walker v. Tim Ryals, et al
as 24-1349
Plaintiff:
Brian Lee Walker
Defendant:
Tim Ryals, Sheriff, Faulkner County, Chad Wooley, Chief Deputy, Faulkner County Sheriff's Office, Jonathan Barnat, Corporal, Faulkner County Detention Center and others
United States of America v. Faulkner et al
as 7:2024cv00347
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Michael Faulkner and Cape Fear Transportation LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
FAULKNER v. DEFENDANT 1 et al
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
DONNAIRE FAULKNER
Defendant:
DEFENDANT 1 a/k/a XIANGMING CHEN, DEFENDANT 2 a/k/a MING CHEN, DEFENDANT 3 a/k/a YANG HAOYU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
