Cases 11 - 20 of 70
Ramos v Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections (Osceola County)
as 6:2023cv01342
Petitioner:
Jorge L. Ramos
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramos et al v. Funding Rush, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01016
Plaintiff:
Trinidad Ramos, Diana Ramos and Eric L. Ramos
Defendant:
Funding Rush, Inc., Andrew Adrian Dioli, Ralph Martinez and others
Counter Defendant:
Lexington Mortgage Company and Lil' Wave Financial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Ramos v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv06541
Plaintiff:
Brenda L. Ramos
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
RAMOS-VARGAS v. WARD et al
as 2:2022cv04606
Plaintiff:
JOSE L. RAMOS-VARGAS and JOSE L. RAMOS VARGAS
Defendant:
ESQ. ALEXANDER WARD, JUDGE MICHAEL KOURY and ALEXANDER WARD, ESQ.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Tiffany et al
as 3:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
Victor L Ramos
Defendant:
Tiffany, John Doe and Randy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strouth v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv01055
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY STROUTH
Defendant:
Greg C. Garland, Phillips 66 Partners LP, Gary Adams and others
Burks v. Ramos et al
as 1:2021cv00461
Plaintiff:
Elmontha Burks
Defendant:
L Ramos and USP Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2021cv01308
Plaintiff:
E. F., ROBERT A CHAPMAN, OREN D. GINGRICH and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
