Cases 11 - 20 of 788
Thacker v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 6:2024cv06005
Plaintiff:
Bryan Thacker
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Stinson v. Memphis Light Gas & Water et al
as 1:2023cv24733
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Defendant:
Memphis Light Gas & Water and Jeremy Thacker individually doing business as Pridestaff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Randy Thacker v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-13910
Petitioner / Appellant:
RANDY THACKER
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Meyers v. Reidinger et al
as 3:2023cv00812
Defendant:
David Meyers, Martin Reidinger, Graham Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 3:2023cv01680
Plaintiff:
Stacy Parker and Tracy Thacker
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Thacker v. Garcia
as 23-50774
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Kent Thacker, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Orlando L. Garcia, U.S. District Judge, Fred Biery, U.S. District Judge, Jason Kenneth Pulliam, U.S. District Judge and others
Thacker v. Lumpkin
as 23-50773
Petitioner / Appellant:
David Kent Thacker, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and Greg Abbott, Governor of the State of Texas
US v. Timothy Thacker
as 23-7102
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TIMOTHY R. THACKER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
