Cases 11 - 20 of 31,441
Lionel Thompson v. United States
as 24-2277
Petitioner:
Lionel Thompson
Respondent:
United States of America
Thompson v. State of Washington, et al.
as 24-3841
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. THOMPSON
Defendant:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, KELLY MONTGOMERY, Senior Deputy Prosecutor, SUSAN OLSON, District Court Judge and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hammad et al v. Thompson et al
as 1:2024cv03099
Plaintiff:
Nusayba Hammad, Eric Horowitz, Sajia Hanif and others
Defendant:
William C. Thompson, Jr., Sandra Wilkin, Michael Aravanites and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Thompson v. Regions Security Services, Inc.
as 24-11998
Plaintiff:
DAVID THOMPSON
Defendant:
REGIONS SECURITY SERVICES, INC.
Bullard #093272 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00948
Petitioner:
Jason Corey Bullard
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell, Gerald Thompson and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2024cv21515
Plaintiff:
Brad Thompson
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
CABRERA-ARTEAGA v. WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv05441
Petitioner:
SANTOS EDELMIR CABRERA ARTEAGA and SANTOS EDELMIR CABRERA-ARTEAGA
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thompson v. A.J. Rose Manufacturing Co.
as 1:2024cv00741
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Thompson
Defendant:
A.J. Rose Manufacturing Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Berry v. Bailey et al
as 5:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Heath Berry, Jade Baker, Daniel Anderson and others
Defendant:
William C Bailey, Robert E (Bud) Cramer, Jim Scanlon and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
