Cases 11 - 20 of 1,751
Langwell v. USA
as 2:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Weston Scott Langwell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Cleveland, Lamundrick v. Blizzard et al
as 6:2024cv00837
Petitioner:
Lamundrick R Cleveland
Respondent:
Attorney Jason T Blizzard, Kathryn D. Weston and Asst State Attorney Amie M Assent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cleveland, Lamundrick v. Blizzard et al
as 1:2024cv21709
Plaintiff:
Lamundrick R. Cleveland
Defendant:
Jason T. Blizzard, Kathryn D. Weston and Amie M. Assent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Cleveland v. Blizzard et al
as 6:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Lamundrick R Cleveland
Defendant:
Attorney Jason T Blizzard, Circuit Judge Kathryn D. Weston and Asst State Attorney Amie M Assent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weston v. Tweedy et al
as 1:2024cv01773
Plaintiff:
Shicola Weston
Defendant:
Jessie Lee Tweedy, V. Paulius and Associates (Inc.) and Redi Cold, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Weston v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01339
Plaintiff:
Janey Weston
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Weston v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00687
Plaintiff:
James Weston
Defendant:
Angel Quiros and James Dzurenda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eric Weston v. NCAA
as 24-8011
Petitioner:
ERIC WESTON
Respondent:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
Backyard Shenanigans LLC v The Play Cafe LLC
as 6:2024cv01704
Plaintiff:
Backyard Shenanigans LLC doing business as Kids Play and Cafe
Defendant:
Play Cafe LLC, The, Daniel Weston Kingsbury and Austin Motes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
