Cases 11 - 20 of 21,953
United States v. Robert Woods
as 24-2147
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Robert Q. Woods
Jackson v. Morris et al
as 1:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Kennin Dwayne Jackson
Defendant:
Deputy, Mr. Morris, Deputy, Mr. A. Wood, Deputy, Mr. Stearns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. DOE et al
as 6:2024cv06347
Plaintiff:
Lumumba Woods
Defendant:
Superintendent JOHN DOE, Dep. Kelly, Dsp K VanNote and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woods v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv02082
Plaintiff:
Vernice Woods
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Woods et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 4:2024cv02075
Plaintiff:
Roderick Woods and Melody Woods
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
NicQuid, LLC, et al v. FDA, et al
as 24-3464
Petitioner:
NICQUID, LLC and WOOD CREEK VAPORY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, M.D. ROBERT CALIFF, Commissioner U.S. Food and Drug Administration and SECRETARY XAVIER BECERRA, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
NicQuid v. FDA
as 24-60272
Petitioner:
NicQuid, L.L.C. and Wood Creek Vapory
Respondent:
Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs and Xavier Becerra, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Daniel Woods v. Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Ser
as 24-11815
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WOODS
Defendant:
SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Rodriguez et al v. General Motors LLC
as 7:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Rodriguez and Patrick Woods
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Woods v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Christopher Demetrius Woods
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
