Cases 11 - 20 of 339
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Aerotek Inc. v. Babcock & Wilcox Solar Energy, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00177
Defendant:
Babcock & Wilcox Solar Energy, Inc. and Fosler Construction Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Aerotek Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Aerotek, Inc. v. Power Industries, LLC
as 3:2023cv01643
Plaintiff:
Aerotek, Inc
Defendant:
Power Industries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Aerotek, Inc. et al v. ML Builders, LLC
as 6:2023cv05557
Plaintiff:
Aerotek, Inc. and Actalent, Inc.
Defendant:
ML Builders, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Zamudio v. Aerotek, Inc., et al.
as 1:2021cv01673
Plaintiff:
Diana Vega Zamudio
Defendant:
Aerotek, Inc., and Caterpillar Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv06265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Britt v. Newburn et al
as 2:2023cv02431
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Michelle Britt
Defendant:
Darius Newburn, Aerotek, Inc. and Aerotek Affiliated Services, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Temiika Gipson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
