Cases 11 - 20 of 2,648
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01525
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Lafta v. Williamson County Justice of the Peace 1 et al
as 1:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Lafta
Defendant:
Williamson County Justice of the Peace 1, Jose Del Carmen Santiago Servin, Lonestar Managing General Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Lafta v. The Law Office of Matthew Shrum, PLLC et al
as 1:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Lafta
Defendant:
The Law Office of Matthew Shrum, PLLC, Malcolm Greenstein and Khaled Alsarhan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Dept. of Social Services Division of Child Support v. Nasiem Shabazz El
as 24-1457
Plaintiff:
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT CENTRAL VIRGINIA DISTRICT OFFICE, ARTHUR MISKIMON and SADE BATTLE
Defendant:
NASIEM AHMAD SHABAZZ EL
Spann v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Jihad Ahmad Spann
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lafta v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Lafta
Defendant:
State of Texas, Travis County, Heman Marion Sweatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
