Cases 11 - 20 of 38
McCarter v. USA (RHC)
as 3:2016cv00302
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Alan Wayne McCarter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. Berkebile et al
as 4:2015cv00063
Petitioner:
Alan Wayne Williams
Respondent:
David Berkebile and Tim Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hoffman v. Van Wieren
as 1:2014cv00157
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Oliver Hoffman, III
Defendant:
Alan Wayne Van Wieren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wayne Brothers, Inc. et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 2:2014cv00133
Plaintiff:
Wayne Brothers, Inc. , Alan Wayne and Mike Wayne
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company and Norfolk Southern Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00027
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Love v. Dart et al
as 1:2012cv09310
Plaintiff:
Alan Wayne Love
Defendant:
Tom Dart , E. Byrnes, Mike Taft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alan Wayne Gockley v. Francisco J Quintana et al
as 2:2012cv04664
Petitioner:
Alan Wayne Gockley
Respondent:
L McGrew and Francisco J Quintana
Thomas et al v. Jensen International Inc et al
as 4:2011cv00293
Plaintiff:
Alan Wayne Thomas and Penny Ludwig
Defendant:
Jensen International Inc and Jencast Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KMA Holding Company Inc v. Alan Wayne Company LLC The
as 5:2011cv00292
Plaintiff:
KMA Holding Company Inc
Defendant:
Alan Wayne Company LLC The
Counter_claimant:
Alan Wayne Company LLC The
Counter_defendant:
KMA Holding Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Buckley v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 5:2010cv01038
Plaintiff:
Alan Wayne Buckley
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and World Savings Bank, FSB
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1441 (a) Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
