Cases 11 - 20 of 90
Daniel Rodriguez v. Stephen Morris, et al
as 21-16024
Respondent / Appellee:
STEPHEN MORRIS and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL ALEXANDER RODRIGUEZ
Rodriguez Martinez v. Garland
as 21-169
Petitioner:
NELSON ALEXANDER RODRIGUEZ MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gomez et al v. Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00657
Plaintiff:
Veronica Trevino Garza, Individually and A/N/F o Vxxxxxxx Txxxxxx, a Minor, Santana Arias Gomez, Jesus Esparza, Individually and A/N/F of Axxxx Exxxxxx, a Minor and others
Defendant:
NSK, Ltd, Applied Industrial Technologies, Inc., NSK Precision America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. Unknown
as 3:2021cv00040
Plaintiff:
Walter Alexander Rodriguez
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. ESTOCK et al
as 2:2021cv00142
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT LEE J. ESTOCK
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv07633
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv93411
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez #242516 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv01454
Defendant:
Centurion Healthcare, Wendy Orm, A Wright and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Alexander Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez #242516 et al v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv01397
Plaintiff:
David Mada, Michael Ross, Anthony Pretto and others
Defendant:
Centurion Healthcare, Wendy Eccles, Wendy Orm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson Rodriguez-Martinez v. William Barr
as 20-71575
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
NELSON ALEXANDER RODRIGUEZ-MARTINEZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
