Cases 11 - 20 of 90
JIMENEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01539
Plaintiff:
LUIS ANTONIO JIMENEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jimenez v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2021cv01574
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Jimenez
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimenez v. Mercy Maricopa Regional Behavioral Health of Arizona
as 2:2021cv01542
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Jimenez
Defendant:
Mercy Maricopa Regional Behavioral Health of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Jimenez v. Newell et al
as 2:2021cv01544
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Jimenez
Defendant:
Julie P Newell, Christopher T Whitten, Neil V Wake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimenez v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2021cv01541
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Jimenez, Jesus Joel Vargas, Juan Manuel Flores, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Jimenez-Ramirez
as 21-40165
Defendant / Appellant:
Franklin Alexander Jimenez-Ramirez, also known as Richard Antonio Jimenez Ramirez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Antonio Jimenez-Villanueva v. William Barr
as 20-73234
Petitioner:
ANTONIO JIMENEZ-VILLANUEVA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Yeury Jimenez Sanchez v. Director New York Field Office, et al
as 20-2434
Defendant / Appellant:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DIRECTOR NEW YORK FIELD OFFICE IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and DIRECTOR HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
YEURY ANTONIO JIMENEZ SANCHEZ
US v. Jimenez-Quelex
as 20-1726
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
FELIX ANTONIO JIMENEZ-QUELEX
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01329
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
