Cases 11 - 20 of 45,711
Hoglund v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2017cv00824
Plaintiff:
Keith Hoglund
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Edgar D Whitcomb, Mitch Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hassel v. Astrue
as 3:2017cv05811
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Hassel
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Robeson v. Astrue
as 1:2017cv05407
Plaintiff:
Mendel Tzvi Robeson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Garner v. United States Department of Defense et al
as 2:2017cv00459
Plaintiff:
Theresa Garner
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense, United States Department of Commerce, Social Security Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Collins v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2017cv00049
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Eric Kenneth Collins
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Miller v. Astrue
as 1:2017cv00001
Plaintiff:
Rickey Thomas Miller
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Skinner v. Astrue
as 1:2016cv03957
Plaintiff:
Margaret Christine Skinner
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thomas v. Astrue
as 2:2016cv06537
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Mr. Steven Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ronald Welch v. Michael Astrue
as 16-56544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD A. WELCH
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security
Stephanie Delzer, et al v. Michael Astrue
as 16-56203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHANIE DELZER, on her own behalf of her minor children C.O.D.1 and C.O.D.2, C. O. D. 1 and C. O. D. 2
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, in his official capacity, and his employees, agents and successors in office
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.