Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Richardson v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2015cv02207
Plaintiff:
Ben Lee Richardson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Adams et al v. Garvin County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 5:2014cv01337
Plaintiff:
George Isam Adams , Barbara J Adams , Ben Lee Adams and others
Defendant:
Garvin County Board of County Commissioners , Jeff Paul , McClain County Board of County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Davenport v. Ben Lee, et al
as 14-16355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD P. DAVENPORT
Defendant - Appellee:
BEN LEE, Dr. at CDCR, REDDY, Dr., DUNLAP, Dr. and others
Ronald Davenport v. Ben Lee, et al
as 14-16354
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD P. DAVENPORT
Defendant - Appellee:
BEN LEE, Dr. at CDCR, REDDY, Dr., DUNLAP, Dr. and others
Lee v. Macomber
as 2:2014cv01667
Petitioner:
Ben Lee
Respondent:
Macomber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lee et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv00976
Plaintiff:
Pamela Denise Lee and Ben Lee
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hyun Park, et al v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd.
as 14-55010
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HYUN PARK, HOWARD REE, SOON LEE and others
Objector - Appellant:
STUART JOHNSON, Individual
Defendant - Appellee:
KOREAN AIR LINES CO., LTD.
Hill v. Robinson et al
as 1:2013cv01214
Plaintiff:
Tommy Eugene Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
Gibson County, Steve Grooms, Chuck Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Combs v. Arnold et al
as 1:2013cv01145
Defendant:
Chuck Arnold, Sherry Jo Smith, Jeff Maitland and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Combs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Arnold et al
as 1:2013cv01144
Defendant:
Chuck Arnold, Sherry Jo Smith, Jeff Maitland and others
Plaintiff:
Mike Horton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
