Cases 11 - 20 of 14,132
Bettis v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Lee Bettis, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Reddell v. Rankin County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Joyce Reddell
Defendant:
Rankin County, Mississippi, Vitalcore Health Strategies, LLC, David Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21829
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451 Employment Discrimination
Bettis v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00411
Plaintiff:
Mary Evie Bettis
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Bettis v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00412
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Bettis
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Lance Milliman v. Jodi Harpstead, et al
as 24-1950
Plaintiff:
Lance Gerald Milliman
Defendant:
Jodi Harpstead, County of Anoka, Brad Johnson and others
GRAHAM v. MEDSTAR WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER et al
as 1:2024cv01308
Plaintiff:
BETTY GRAHAM
Defendant:
MEDSTAR WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER and BRAD FRIEDEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Barnett v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Betty Barnett
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
Peterson v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03540
Plaintiff:
Betty Peterson
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodenhizer et al v. Schoolcraft, County of et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Travis Rodenhizer, Betty Jo Conklin, Judith Anne Clifton and others
Defendant:
Schoolcraft, County of, Jane Couwlier-Bridges and Julie B. Roscioli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
