Cases 11 - 20 of 381
Max Ridings, et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim, et al
as 20-1824
Defendant / Appellee:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim (USA) Corp., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation and others
Defendant:
Matthew Hoesch, Scott Maurice, Jennifer Caskey and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sue Ridings and Max Ridings
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd.
as 5:2020cv00023
Plaintiff:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Defendant:
Aurobindo Pharma Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00019
Plaintiff:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG and others
Defendant:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Mylan Inc. and Mylan Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Orosco v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01890
Defendant:
Bidachem S.p.A, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GMBH & Co. KG, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Rafayal Orosco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al v. Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. et al
as 1:2019cv01772
Defendant:
Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and Macleods Pharma USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust
as 19-754
Plaintiff:
International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, District Council 21 Health and Welfare Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, HEB Grocery Company L.P., Minnesota and North Dakota Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Health Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Teva Women's Health, Inc., FKA Duramed Pharmaceuticals Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Barr Laboratories Inc., a Delaware Corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Pipefitters Union Local NO 537 Health & Welfare Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, AGC-International Union of Operating Engineers Local 701 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Welfare Plan of the International Union of Operation Engineers Locals 137, 137A, 137B, 137C, 137R, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Appellant:
People of the State of California
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., an Israeli Corporation
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMA GMBH & CO. KG et al v. AUROBINDO PHARMA LIMITED et al
as 3:2019cv08840
Plaintiff:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMA GMBH & CO. KG, BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM INTERNATIONAL GMBH
Defendant:
AUROBINDO PHARMA USA, INC. and AUROBINDO PHARMA LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al v. LUPIN ATLANTIS HOLDINGS SA et al
as 3:2018cv16708
Plaintiff:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMA GMBH & CO. KG
Defendant:
LUPIN LIMITED and LUPIN ATLANTIS HOLDINGS SA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al v. LUPIN ATLANTIS HOLDINGS SA et al
as 3:2018cv12663
Plaintiff:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMA GMBH & CO. KG and BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM INTERNATIONAL GMBH
Defendant:
LUPIN LIMITED and LUPIN ATLANTIS HOLDINGS SA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al v. LUPIN ATLANTIS HOLDING SA et al
as 3:2018cv12662
Plaintiff:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM INTERNATIONAL GMBH and BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMA GMBH & CO. KG
Defendant:
LUPIN ATLANTIS HOLDING SA and LUPIN LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
