Cases 11 - 20 of 251
USA v. R'aquan Britten
as 23-13777
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
R'AQUAN BRITTEN
WARREN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv27500
Plaintiff:
BRITTEN WARREN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MONEY v. CERT OFFICER ISOM et al
as 5:2023cv00377
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ISAIAH MONEY
Defendant:
CERT OFFICER ISOM and CERT OFFICER BRITTEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRITTEN v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv01119
Plaintiff:
CHANCE BRITTEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Andrews v. Goodwill Industries of Middle Georgia, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Britten Y. Andrews
Defendant:
Goodwill Industries of Middle Georgia, Inc., Kristen Dahl, Collen Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Charles Winn LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02988
Defendant:
Aaron David Scott-Britten, Ohran Emmanuel Stewart, Charles Winn LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Martin v. State of Utah, et al
as 23-4045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
C. MICHAEL MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF UTAH, BRITTEN LUND, KIM DIMOND-SMITH and others
Britten v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Allen Patricia Britten
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Clark County School District v. USDC-NVL
as 22-70252
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, J. W., JOSHUA WAHRER and others
Petitioner:
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS
Williams v. Britten et al
as 2:2022cv12605
Petitioner:
Michael B. Williams
Respondent:
K. Britten, Michigan Department of Correctional and Kym Worthy
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
