Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Nottingham v. Butts et al
as 4:2018cv02003
Defendant:
Matthew Welickovitch, Jason Cooley, Eric Linhardt and others
Plaintiff:
James E. Nottingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv00404
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
United States of America v. Brown
as 2:2017mj30462
Defendant:
Adam Blake Brown
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Brown
as 2:2017mj30462
Defendant:
Adam Blake Brown
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Brown, et al v. Perez, et al
as 15-1023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BLAKE BROWN, DEAN BIGGS, JACQUELINE DEHERRERA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS E. PEREZ, Secretary of Labor, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, an agency of the United States and OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION, an agency of the United States Department of Labor
Brown et al v. Perez
as 1:2013cv01722
Plaintiff:
Blake Brown , Dean Biggs , Jacqueline DeHerrera and others
Defendant:
Seth D. Harris, United States Department of Labor and Office of Workers Compensation Programs
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
USA v. Blake Brown, Jr.
as 12-4085
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BLAKE BROWN, JR.
USA v. Blake Brown, Jr.
as 12-3952
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
BLAKE BROWN, JR.
Aquilex Hydrochem, Inc. v. Marshall
as 5:2011cv00319
Plaintiff:
Aquilex Hydrochem, Inc.
Defendant:
Ronald Marshall and Blake Brown
Movant:
PSC Industrial Outsourcing, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Coil Tubing Services, L.L.C. et al
as 4:2009cv03351
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith, Adam Crews, Donald Woodard and others
Defendant:
Coil Tubing Services, L.L.C., Smith International Inc., Houston Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
